 | Chess Multiplayer |
Grant and you will unmask!
Crazy name, real matters
Crazy name, real matters
p8ntballjunky1
3 ( +1 | -1 )
KING'S GAMBIT ?? HELP ME, SHOULD I TAKE IT OR NO!
More: Castling In Chess
acne
pbarts89
2 ( +1 | -1 )
I think you have this posted in two forums... but yes take it! You'll have fun
More: Multiplayer Chess Online
persianelephant
tulkos
19 ( +1 | -1 )
Practice makes perfect--- you'll probably lose your first games,but then you'll learn more about the opening and start to win yourself.declining is safer,but you get a worse position---at least thats my experience.
More: Chess Tactics Server
philaretus
15 ( +1 | -1 )
The opinion of theorists.... .....is that the King's Gambit Declined is more difficult than the King's Gambit Accepted, so that to begin with you're advised to accept.
More: Easy Chess
certainratio
10 ( +1 | -1 )
consider declining I personally have a much better record with
2...d5 than with 2...exf4.
CertainRatio
More: Multiplayer Chess
adrianallen
16 ( +1 | -1 )
Check out old games Do a search on www.chessgames.com for kings gambit and look at games won by white in 10 moves or under. All the games I checked were accepted, so it gives you an idea of what not to do :)
More: Chess Vs Computer
brunetti
39 ( +1 | -1 )
No. You can't get an idea by looking at short blunder-featuring games (that's the case if White wins in 10 moves)!
You should make a search, instead, of games played by two players rated, say, at least 2300, and compare the results.
Nowadays the best defences are considered the Modern (2...exf4 3.Nf3 d5), Fischer (2...exf4 3.Nf3 d6 followed by ...g5 and ...h6), and KG declined with 2...Bc5, some complex lines of Nimzowitsch 2...d5 3...c6, and 2...Qh4+ 3.g3 Qe7.
Alex
adrianallen
paulvalle
p8ntballjunky1
p8ntballjunky1
keiserpaul