Tags: online chess, play chess online, online chess, online chess, chess online, chess online, online backgammon
Chess Forum
www6conf.org << online chess - < chess - chess > - chess online >>
| From | Message | Posted by bhidragon
www6conf.org
12/13/2007
16:52:18
Play online chess |  Subject: Strategy v. tactics v. position
Message:
There's a lot of discussion on the board about what people mean by "a tactical player" or "e4 leads to a tactical game", etc. You run into these terms in chess books ... and on chess sites ... and they can be a bit confusing. Here's my take on the differences. Actually, there are two different comparisons being made.
The first is Strategy v. Tactics. In this case, "strategy" refers to your long-range goal in the game given a specific position. This includes the big questions like "do I attack the castled King or try to push a pawn through on the Q-side", or, "do I try to trade down to an end-game or keep playing a middle game"? The term "tactics" here refers to the specific moves you use to accomplish your strategy.
The second comparison is that of Positional v. Tactical positions. Open postions, more likely to flow out of e4 openings, are considered more tactical in nature ... where things happen very quickly and big food fights are the norm. More closed positions, resulting form d4 ... QGD for example ... rely more on positional maneuvering for much of the game.
To confuse the issue even more, players tend to think of themselves as tactical, strategic or positional ... which may or may not be the case in fact.
Make sense?
| Posted by lighttotheright
www6conf.org
12/13/2007
17:12:14
Play online chess |
Message:
Let me try to make this simple.
'Tactical' refers to what you do; 'strategic' refers to what you plan to do; and 'positional' refers to what you possibly can or cannot do.
| Posted by ganstaman
www6conf.org
12/13/2007
18:27:59
Play online chess |
Message:
The problem I have with this is that while more 1.e4 openings are tactical and more 1.d4 openings are strategic, that says nothing about an individuals personal repertoire. You could play only very strategic, non-tactical 1.e4 openings or crazy tactical 1.d4 openings. So unless you plan on rolling a 20-sided die to choose your opening, it really makes no sense to think: "Okay, this game starts 1.e4 so it's going to be tactical."
Also, I think it was Eric Schiller who said: amateurs don't have styles, they just have a set of weaknesses. In other words, if any of us thought that we were very positional, strategic players, it probably means that we need to work on our tactics. I think this is true.
———
Grand Slam Masters: Both Carlsen and Anand lose — After a sensational third round of the Grand Slam Masters chess tournament at Sao Paulo, World chess champion Viswanathan Anand and World No. 1 Magnus Carlsen of Norway languished at the bottom of the points table. Anand bowed to an in-form Vassily Ivanchuk of Ukraine while Carlsen called all the shots against bottom-ranked player Vallejo Pons of Spain before blundering a piece to leave the tournament in a state of shock before the first rest day. The football points system ensured that Ivanchuk, with seven points, had a good lead over the rest of the field. Levon Aronian of Armenia was in second position with five points, Hikaru Nakamura of US and Vallejo Pons were further down ...
Posted by bhidragon
www6conf.org
12/14/2007
03:20:56
Play online chess | True
Message:
Ganstaman is correct ... for example look at the Sicilian, which can be very open or quite closed depending on the systems played by the opponents. I was only refering to the "reasonably expected in general" types of positions in the openings.
The main point was this -- there's a bit of difference between "tactics" and "tactical positions" or "tactical players".
———
Who's the man? — When I was a much younger man, I saw a film titled "Who's the Man?" It was a light comedy, but throughout the movie, the two main characters would pronounce, "You the man!" to each other. In the chess world, this was never an issue. Well, not until recently. Since 1886, there was always an official World Chess Champion. The chess world always knew who "the man" was, until 1993 and the infamous Kasparov-Short match. Garry Kasparov, clearly the best chess player in the world and the World Chess Champion to boot, was to defend his title against the lesser-know British GM Nigel Short. Nigel was one of the top 10 chess players in the world, but nobody thought he could beat Kasparov. Kasparov and ...
Posted by ionadowman
www6conf.org
12/14/2007
04:42:51
Play online chess | Perhaps an epigram ...
Message:
... might adequately state the difference between tactics and strategy:
"Tactics is what you do when there's something to do; strategy is what you do when there's nothing to do" ;-)
Or, one might argue that tactics is the means by which a strategy is carried out. Plans can be strategic or tactical, though the further ahead you are looking, and the less move-specific, the more likely the plan is to be strategic in scope.
A tactical player will still make strategic decisions, for example, to create and to maintain the kind of dynamic disequilibrium that will maximise the chances of situations arising that can be exploited by tactical means. Even Mikhail Tal found it occasionally preferable to proceed by "strategic" means, if any imbalance that he might be able to bring about favoured his opponent too much.
———
On Chess: World-title foes differ on workouts — In an era of 14-year-old grandmasters and Internet-nurtured chess prodigies, 43-year-old Boris Gelfand of Israel is an anomaly. After 20 years of being near the top of the chess heap, he is playing a match — his first — for the world chess championship. It will take place against the current chess champion, 41-year-old Viswanathan Anand — also one of the older set — who has played several title matches. Anand insists that a rigorous conditioning regime — including trips to the gym — is a prerequisite for success at the top level. Gelfand has a more nonchalant point of view. “It strikes me,” he recently told journalist Yuri Vasiliev, “that the basis of success is a healthy way of life. You need to ...
| | |
|